Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Fever on July 18, 2008 at 11:27am

HE'S NOT GOING TO DIRECTLY. his little obamanistas will do it for him, you read it on here all the time, vote black vote barak. Or even better anybody that is black and doesnt is a traitor, to what socialism......hmmmm? I can live with that, F*** SOCIALISM AND SOCIALIST.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by That n**** Doc on July 18, 2008 at 11:29am

Well, obviously, you're very political and have reasons for speaking on these issues. I respect your point of view to the upmost. However, to us black people out here, we just wanna see a black man in the White House. Then, we'll find somethin else to complain about. (Refer to my discussion, Does B.E.T. contribute to racism in America.)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by class_act on July 18, 2008 at 11:05am

It sounds like the blacck guy is a republican and the white guy is a Democrate.

Anyway you are going to have to watch Obama`s ass. His father was from Africa so it has no bearings on him when it comes to issues such as slavery. He never marched in the civil rights movement, and even though he says he worked in the African American community as a organizer he takes the same stance on Black folks that his white grandmother does.

He say black people have to take responsibility. Okay I get it. But do you have the credibility to say such things; "being a half white man" who does not share with what other black folk have, under Jim Crow?
And Obama, if you think you do then; you are certainly, as described by your counterparts an elitest!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Fever on July 18, 2008 at 11:28am

SORRY SOCIALIST'S YOU'RE WRONG AGAIN :-)

1) Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) contains a mean expected value of 10.4 billion barrels of technically recoverable oil, whose daily output of nearly 1.4 million barrels would be larger than the current daily onshore oil production of any of the lower 48 states.
2) The Minerals Management Service (MMS) of the Department of Interior estimates that beneath the waters of the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) lie some 76 billion barrels of oil in yet-to-be-discovered fields. That's three and a half times U.S. proved oil reserves.
3) Offshore oil reserves in the Gulf of Mexico alone are estimated to be more than 40 billion barrels, much of it precluded from exploration by official U.S. policy.
Source: Editorial, "Communists, Oil and the Florida Coast," Washington Times, May 4, 2006.
4) Colorado and Utah have as much oil as Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Venezuela, Nigeria, Kuwait, Libya, Angola, Algeria, Indonesia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates combined.
That's not science fiction. Trapped in limestone up to 200 feet thick in the two Rocky Mountain states is enough so-called shale oil to rival OPEC and supply the U.S. for a century.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by class_act on July 18, 2008 at 11:21am

???
Hold politicians accountable!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Fever on July 18, 2008 at 11:29am

Now that i can definitely agree with, how is that done though?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ThemeMusicRecordings on July 18, 2008 at 11:37am

OF COURSE NOT. OBAMAS ONE OF THEM. NO MATTER WHO YOU PICK THEY ALL PART OF THE BOHEMIAN CLUB...TALK ABOUT THAT. UNLESS YOUR PART OF IT TOO????

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by young ether on July 18, 2008 at 11:44am

WHATS WRONG WIT SOCIALISM??

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Fever on July 18, 2008 at 12:11pm

IT NEVER WORKS, its the first step to communism like in nazi Germany, cuba, venezuela, china, russia, etc.

Have you noticed that in socialist/communist countries LIKE CUBA the people are not ALLOWED to leave the country, why is that. Because that system doesn't work, its slavery. People ARE always trying to sneak out a socialist country but they NEVER try to sneak in.

http://perspectives.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=161295&forum_i...

Communism Fails at Jamestown, Virginia

Private Property to the Rescue

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.ccsindia.org/article/people_rw_when_us_tried_communism.asp

Centre for Civil Society

When US tried Communism
The Himalayan Times,
24 Jan 2005
Rakesh Wadhwa


I write this especially for our Maoist brothers. While the US is commonly vilified as the bastion of capitalism, it is little known that the US too has tried communism. It was only when communism failed that property rights and capitalism took hold.

Let us go back into history and see what lessons America learned from its relatively short dalliance with Maoism much before the ‘great leader' himself was born.

The year was 1607. The first 104 settlers had arrived from Europe in Jamestown in the Virginia Tidewater region of the US in May. They found soil which was fertile beyond what they had seen in the lands which they had left. Fruits were abundant. Wild game such as deer and turkey were everywhere. There was no shortage of fish and other seafood. And yet within six months 66 of the original Jamestown, Virginia settlers had died. Only 38 survived.

Another 500 settlers were again sent to settle in Virginia in 1609 and within six months 440 of these too died by starvation and disease. This was called ‘starving time' and one eyewitness described it in English of those times, ‘So great was our famine, that a Savage we slew and buried, the poorer sorte took him up againe and eat him; and so did divers one another boyled and stewed with roots and herbs.'

How could this be? How could there be such death and starvation amidst so much plenty of meat, fruits, and fish. The fault as the witness said lay not in the ‘barrenness and defect of the Countrie' but in the ‘want of providence, industry and government'.

What caused this lack of ‘industrie'? Were the Virginian settlers lazy and indolent? It could not be. People who were sent there were the chosen ones – the very best of men.

The problem was that all the men who were sent were bonded labourers. They had no stake in what they produced. They were bound by contract to put all they produced into a common pool to be used to support their colony as a whole. This was communism in its purest form. Everyone was supposed to work according to ability and take according to need.

As so frequently happens with present day government policies, the results were the opposite of what was intended. Since hard work was not personally beneficial for the settlers they responded by stopping work.

Phillip A. Bruce, a late 19th century US historian, wrote of the Jamestown immigrants, “The settlers did not have even a modified interest in the soil … . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which they had no proprietorship.” The result as Bruce wrote would be what anyone who has any knowledge of human nature would expect, men, even the most energetic, refused to work.

This is what happened in Mao's China and in Soviet Russia on a grand scale. In America a few hundred deaths stopped the communist experiment, in China and Russia, millions had to die before these nations abandoned the principles of Marx, Lenin, and Mao.

Jamestown changed course just two years later in 1611 with arrival of the ‘high marshall'

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by De-U.c.e. Double on July 18, 2008 at 11:53am

Shut da f*** up U cry baby wut U talking bout ain't nothin!!! Do some research on John Mcain's voting history since 1982 if U think dat petty s*** Barack did is bad. Mcain has voted against helping all black civil rights issues 0ver 70% of da time since 82 till now. Read a newspaper or look at CNN sometimes before U hate on da 1st possible black president. Dat Obama s*** ain't nothin' in comparison...Mcains a racist!!!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Fever on July 18, 2008 at 12:18pm

Oh did I strike a nerve, u sound mad little deuce deuce, better get a .40 or better little dude lol.

SORRY SOCIALIST'S YOU'RE WRONG AGAIN :-)

1) Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) contains a mean expected value of 10.4 billion barrels of technically recoverable oil, whose daily output of nearly 1.4 million barrels would be larger than the current daily onshore oil production of any of the lower 48 states.
2) The Minerals Management Service (MMS) of the Department of Interior estimates that beneath the waters of the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) lie some 76 billion barrels of oil in yet-to-be-discovered fields. That's three and a half times U.S. proved oil reserves.
3) Offshore oil reserves in the Gulf of Mexico alone are estimated to be more than 40 billion barrels, much of it precluded from exploration by official U.S. policy.
Source: Editorial, "Communists, Oil and the Florida Coast," Washington Times, May 4, 2006.
4) Colorado and Utah have as much oil as Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Venezuela, Nigeria, Kuwait, Libya, Angola, Algeria, Indonesia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates combined.
That's not science fiction. Trapped in limestone up to 200 feet thick in the two Rocky Mountain states is enough so-called shale oil to rival OPEC and supply the U.S. for a century.

For more on Energy Issues:
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=22


Who said I like McCain you b**** ass n****, starting s*** talking all rude to me over the internet.?
CNN is run by socialist you f****** idiot.

I'll whoop your head boy, LOL.

F****** E-thugs eat a d***. F*** you and Obama the socialist.

LOL

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Infamou$-locz on July 18, 2008 at 12:10pm

NOTHING IS GONNA CHANGE REGARDLESS ONE MAN CANT MAKE A DIFFERENCE IT TAKES A NATION ..POLITICS LIE AND STEAL AND OBAMA IS NO DIFFERENT ITS A CHANGE OF PACE 2 SEE SOMEONE OF COLOUR IN OFFICE OR CAMPAINING BUT THATS NO REASON TO VOTE BLACK JUST CAUSE YOUR BLAACK THATS RETARDED ..HE COULD BE PLAYING YOU ALL LIKE PAST PRESIDENTS AND ALL YOU BLACK PPL TAHT VOTE FOR HIM SOLELY BASED ON HES SKIN COULOUR ARE STUPID GET EDUCATED AND SEE WHAT HES REALLY ABOUT ..EITHER THAT OR START THE REVOLUTION !

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page